Skip to main content
Reading Time: 9 mins

Beyond NDAs: How HR Can Guard IP in the Age of Employee Mobility

This industry insight IP management letter analyzes the Apple vs Rivos case, where Apple accused startup Rivos of hiring engineers who allegedly took confidential SoC knowledge to a rival. The dispute highlights how trade secrets can leak through employee mobility and why HR plays a key role in IP protection. It explains how clear contracts, NDAs, training, monitoring, and strong offboarding prevent misappropriation. The post shows how HR, legal, IT, and security must work together to safeguard critical know-how and avoid costly legal battles.

How a Legal Battle Between Apple and Rivos Became a Wake-Up Call for Protecting Trade Secrets

The battle for top talent has always been fierce in the tech industry, but the Apple vs Rivos case shows how this contest can blur the lines between healthy competition and the misappropriation of intellectual property. Between 2022 and 2024, this high-profile legal clash brought to light the hidden vulnerabilities companies face when confidential knowledge walks out the door with departing employees. The settlement between Apple and Rivos didn’t just end a lawsuit—it left behind a blueprint for how companies should handle intellectual property during onboarding, employment, and offboarding. This post unpacks the history and key lessons of the Apple vs Rivos conflict and explains what every HR department and leadership team should know to protect critical trade secrets.

What Happened Between Apple and Rivos

In the highly competitive world of semiconductor design, Apple’s System on Chip (SoC) team stands at the core of its competitive advantage. These chips power devices from iPhones to Macs, delivering performance and energy efficiency that are central to Apple’s brand promise. Developing this technology takes billions in investment and decades of accumulated know-how, much of which qualifies as protected trade secrets. In 2022, startup Rivos, positioning itself to build competing SoC technologies, began recruiting heavily from Apple’s engineering ranks. Apple alleged that Rivos hired dozens of its engineers and that these former employees brought with them confidential information that could unfairly accelerate Rivos’s development of rival chip solutions. Apple claimed this amounted to misappropriation of trade secrets, a serious offense under US IP law.

The Legal Standoff and Settlement

Rivos denied the allegations and countersued Apple for what it called unfair anti-competitive practices, claiming Apple was trying to stifle legitimate competition by restricting employee mobility. The case dragged on for two years, culminating in a settlement in 2024. As part of the settlement, Apple was given the right to inspect Rivos’s systems for traces of its confidential information and recover any sensitive data that might have been transferred. Claims against six former Apple engineers who had joined Rivos were also resolved under the settlement terms. The dispute highlights classic features of trade secret cases: they often arise from employee mobility, hinge on whether confidential knowledge is improperly used, and tend to be lengthy, expensive, and reputationally risky for all involved.

Key Characteristics of Trade Secret Disputes

The Apple vs Rivos case illustrates several recurring themes in trade secret disputes. First, the role of employee mobility is central. Skilled employees are naturally attractive to competitors, especially in high-tech fields where know-how is as important as patents. Second, these cases revolve around the unauthorized use of confidential knowledge. If employees transfer or misuse trade secrets from a former employer to a new one, they create serious legal and ethical risks. Third, trade secret cases often lead to complex legal battles, settlements, inspections, and sometimes criminal charges. Fourth, the disputes show the importance of proactive trade secret protection through strong employment agreements, clear onboarding and offboarding processes, and active collaboration between HR and legal teams.

Why Trade Secret Protection is an HR Issue

Most companies see IP management as the responsibility of the legal or R&D departments. But the Apple vs Rivos case reveals that HR sits at the frontline of trade secret protection. From the moment a candidate is interviewed to the day they hand in their badge and laptop, HR shapes the processes that either protect or expose a company’s most sensitive knowledge. An airtight IP strategy therefore requires HR and legal teams to work side by side, ensuring that the entire employee lifecycle supports the safeguarding of trade secrets.

How to Build an HR Process to Protect Trade Secrets

To prevent the next Apple vs Rivos situation, companies must develop a robust HR framework that protects trade secrets at every stage of employment. This means aligning hiring, onboarding, training, monitoring, and offboarding with clear IP safeguards.

1 . Onboarding: Employment Agreements and NDAs

Onboarding is the first critical line of defense. Every new hire should sign a well-crafted employment agreement that includes clear IP assignment clauses. This means the employee understands from day one that anything they develop during employment belongs to the company. Next, comprehensive Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) must clearly define what counts as confidential information and detail the employee’s obligations to protect it. Ethical screening should be standard practice, requiring candidates to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. New employees should be explicitly told not to bring or share any confidential information from former employers, and these expectations must be written into contracts and reinforced verbally.

2 . Onboarding: Training and Ethical Conduct

Paperwork alone is not enough. Companies should implement training programs for all new hires that educate them on the company’s IP policies, the nature of trade secrets, and their legal and ethical obligations. This training should not be a one-time event—it needs to be repeated regularly to keep awareness high. An explicit zero-tolerance policy on trade secret misuse must be communicated clearly. HR should ensure that every new hire understands that using or disclosing former employers’ secrets is not only unethical but illegal, putting their job and the company at risk.

3 . During Employment: Culture of Confidentiality

Once employees are onboard, the focus shifts to sustaining a culture of confidentiality. This starts with regular training sessions and awareness campaigns that remind staff of the importance of safeguarding sensitive data. Managers should communicate what counts as a trade secret, where it is stored, and who has access to it. Access to confidential data should be restricted on a need-to-know basis. IT systems must monitor data use, flag anomalies, and enforce access controls. The legal team must work with HR to ensure that confidentiality agreements remain valid and that any violations are addressed promptly.

4 . Offboarding: Formal Exit Processes

Offboarding is often the weakest link in trade secret protection. Employees leaving a company, especially those in sensitive roles, should undergo a formal exit interview. During this meeting, they must be reminded of their continuing obligations to protect the company’s secrets. They should certify that they have returned all physical and digital company property, including devices, storage media, and confidential documents. Access to company systems must be revoked immediately to prevent unauthorized data transfers. HR, IT, and security must coordinate closely to ensure that no loose ends remain.

5 . Offboarding: IP Risk Assessments

For employees with access to critical IP, companies should carry out a detailed IP risk assessment before they leave. This means evaluating what trade secrets they know, what risks their departure poses, and how to mitigate those risks. In high-risk cases, companies may even include post-employment inspection clauses in separation agreements or negotiate limited non-compete or non-solicitation terms if allowed by local labor laws.

Legal Department’s Role: Partner to HR

The legal department’s role is to design the tools HR needs to protect trade secrets. Legal teams should draft airtight employment contracts and NDAs, oversee any litigation related to IP misappropriation, and manage legal risks associated with hiring from competitors. They must also ensure that the company’s IP policies comply with employment law in each relevant jurisdiction. In high-risk cases like Apple vs Rivos, the legal team’s collaboration with HR determines how effectively the company can prevent, detect, and respond to breaches.

IT, Security, and R&D: The Other Guardians of Trade Secrets

While HR and legal lead the charge, they cannot protect trade secrets alone. The IT department must control access to sensitive data, maintain robust cybersecurity systems, and monitor data transfers to detect suspicious behavior. Strong authentication, encryption, and audit trails are essential. The security department must manage the physical safety of facilities and workspaces, ensuring that sensitive information does not leak through unauthorized visitors or unmonitored areas. The research and development (R&D) team plays a unique role by identifying what knowledge qualifies as a trade secret, classifying it properly, and working with legal to determine how it should be protected. R&D should collaborate with HR and legal teams to define clear confidentiality boundaries so that all stakeholders know what is sensitive and what is not.

Processes That Strengthen Trade Secret Protection

A robust trade secret strategy needs clear, documented processes that cross departmental lines. First, companies must identify, define, and document all trade secrets and confidential information. Without clear definitions, it is impossible to monitor or protect them. Cross-departmental collaboration is essential: HR, legal, IT, and security must meet regularly to align on new threats, best practices, and incident response plans. Onboarding and offboarding protocols must be integrated with technical safeguards and regularly tested through audits and risk assessments. Companies should also run joint training sessions so that employees from different departments understand how their actions impact trade secret security. Incident response processes must be in place to detect breaches early, investigate thoroughly, and act decisively. Secure data management policies, including data classification, encryption, and backup controls, complete the framework.

The Apple vs Rivos Legacy

The Apple vs Rivos case is far from unique—it is a wake-up call for any company that relies on trade secrets for competitive advantage. In industries like semiconductor design, software, and biotechnology, human knowledge is as important as patents and trademarks. If that knowledge leaks, the damage is almost impossible to reverse. HR has the unique position of controlling the first and last mile of the employee journey. By embedding robust trade secret protection into every phase—from recruitment and onboarding to daily operations and offboarding—companies can prevent the next costly, reputation-damaging trade secret dispute.

Conclusion

Trade secret protection is not just a legal or technical challenge—it is an organizational culture. It requires clear policies, strong cross-functional cooperation, and a deep commitment to ethics at every level of the business. The Apple vs Rivos story shows how fragile IP can be when employees move between rivals in high-tech industries. But it also shows how companies that take IP management seriously, and equip HR with the right tools and processes, can protect their crown jewels without stifling talent mobility. For companies determined to protect what makes them special, the lessons are clear: plan ahead, train your people, watch the exits, and work as one. That is the only way to keep your secrets truly secret.

Picture by Jeremy Waterhouse at Pexels

Expert

Editorial Staff