Erdem Kaya is Subject Matter Expert in the CEIPI-EPO Master of IP Law and Management
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, software is no longer just a supporting element; it’s the core of countless business models and a key driver of innovation👉 Practical application of new ideas to create value.. From startups to established enterprises, the ability to protect intellectual property👉 Creations of the mind protected by legal rights. (IP) in software is crucial for competitive advantage, attracting investment, and ensuring long-term success. However, the path to securing robust software patents is fraught with unique challenges, particularly within the diverse legal frameworks across the globe. This blog post is a summary of the sixth module of the CEIPI-EPO Master Program in IP Law and Management (MIPLM) on the role of software patents in digital business models. An overview of this lecture is available here:
The Intricacies of Software Patenting in the Digital Industry
The patentability of software has long been a contentious and complex issue, differing significantly from traditional inventions👉 A novel method, process or product that is original and useful. with tangible physical components. Unlike copyrights, which automatically protect the creative expression of software code, patents demand a higher bar: a technical innovation that is novel, non-obvious, and industrially applicable. This distinction often creates a misconception that software innovations cannot be patented, deterring many innovators from seeking protection.
One of the primary challenges lies in the abstract nature of software. Purely algorithmic or business methods, for instance, are generally not patentable “as such.” The key often lies in demonstrating that the software solves a technical problem using technical means. For example, software designed to manage administrative tasks, such as selecting candidates for a position, might not be patentable if its solution is administrative rather than technical. However, software that extends the maintenance cycle of a laser cutting machine by running on an industrial computer and controlling the machine’s operations does solve a technical problem and can be patentable. This fine line requires careful articulation of the invention’s technical contribution, moving beyond mere functionality to highlight how it addresses a specific technological challenge.
Furthermore, the global nature of the digital industry adds another layer of complexity. Patentability criteria and examination practices vary considerably across jurisdictions. While the United States has historically been more permissive in granting software patents, the European Patent👉 A legal right granting exclusive control over an invention for a limited time. Office (EPO) employs a rigorous “problem-solution” approach. This method requires identifying prior art, defining a technical problem solved by the invention, and assessing whether a skilled person could have easily derived the solution. This means that a software innovation must provide a tangible technical benefit — such as more efficient data processing, improved system performance, or a new way to configure a network — to meet the EPO’s requirements for patentability. Navigating these regional differences demands a strategic understanding of where and how to file patent applications to ensure effective protection globally. The rapid evolution of technologies like AI, IoT👉 “Connected devices exchanging data via internet for smart functionality”, and 5G further complicates matters, as many mistakenly believe innovations in these digital domains are outside the scope of patent protection, despite their clear potential for patentability when framed as technical solutions to technical problems.
Overcoming Specific IP Management Challenges
Beyond the inherent complexities of software patentability, businesses, especially startups and small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), face a range of specific IP management👉 Strategic and operative handling of IP to maximize value. challenges. A significant hurdle is the initial lack of awareness and prioritization of IP protection. In the fast-paced, resource-constrained environment of a startup, the focus is often on market entry and revenue generation, pushing IP considerations to the back burner. While most tech entrepreneurs and investors understand the importance of building an IP portfolio, identifying patentable inventions and proactively consulting with IP professionals early in the development cycle remains a challenge. This can lead to missed opportunities, unintentional disclosures that destroy novelty👉 Requirement that an invention must be new and not previously disclosed., and vulnerabilities to imitation by competitors with greater resources.
Another critical IP management challenge lies in aligning IP strategy👉 Approach to manage, protect, and leverage IP assets. with overall business objectives👉 Clear, measurable goals guiding a company’s strategy, priorities, and resource allocation.. A comprehensive IP strategy should not merely aim for obtaining patents but should actively support fundraising efforts, market dominance, and potential acquisition. For instance, a strong IP portfolio signals uniqueness and potential value to investors, making companies more attractive for external funding. However, many engineers and innovators, conditioned to think incrementally and technically, often overlook strategic IP opportunities unless guided by broader business and IP goals. This disconnect can lead to patents that, while technically sound, may not translate into significant commercial advantage.
Furthermore, the increasing number of software patent👉 Protection of computer-implemented inventions, as a technical solution realized by software applications and the complexity of patent information present their own challenges. While digital tools can streamline some aspects of IP management, there’s still a need for expert guidance that can demystify patent information and patent knowledge for clients and help them navigate the intricacies of patent law. Ensuring that IP specialists are integrated into product development, marketing, and business development discussions from the early stages is crucial to foster a company culture that recognizes the importance of IP in creating a competitive advantage. The challenge extends to continuously monitoring developments in IP law and emerging technologies to adapt IP strategies and maintain a robust defensive moat against potential threats.
Erdem Kaya’s Approach: A Best Practice for Software Patenting in Europe
In this challenging environment, subject matter experts like Erdem Kaya offer invaluable guidance, and his approach to software patenting in Europe represents a best practice for addressing these practical hurdles.
Kaya’s perspective, informed by the EPO’s stringent “problem-solution” approach, underscores the importance of precisely defining the technical problem that a software invention solves. This goes beyond simply describing the software’s functionality and instead focuses on its innovative contribution to a technical field. For instance, instead of merely stating that software manages data, the emphasis would be on how it achieves more efficient data processing or enables a novel technical interaction within a system. This rigorous framing helps to clearly demonstrate the invention’s patentability, even if the software itself is deemed non-technical “as such.”
A core tenet of this best practice is the proactive and early engagement of IP professionals. Kaya’s work advocates for identifying potentially patentable features early in the development cycle, long before public disclosure, to preserve novelty. This involves a collaborative effort between engineers, developers, and IP experts to “harvest innovation” by systematically identifying and documenting technical solutions to market-defined challenges. By working with experienced IP professionals, companies can draft strong patent applications that highlight the technical contributions of their AI and software innovations, ensuring robust IP protection in a competitive market. This contrasts with a reactive approach where IP is only considered after a product is developed, often leading to missed opportunities or weak patent claims.
Furthermore, Erdem Kaya’s approach aligns with the broader understanding that IP is a strategic business asset, not just a legal formality. It recognizes that software patents, when strategically timed, can significantly increase company valuation and attract investors. This involves developing a comprehensive IP strategy that considers a mix of IP protections — including software patents for core technologies, trade secrets for proprietary data or methods, copyrights for code, and trademarks for branding — to create a robust defensive moat. The emphasis is on building an IP portfolio that supports long-term business goals, facilitates collaborations, and provides a sustainable competitive advantage in the dynamic digital industry.
In conclusion, navigating the complex world of software patenting and IP management requires a clear understanding of the challenges and a strategic, proactive approach. By focusing on technical problem-solving, engaging with IP professionals early, and aligning IP strategy with the overall business strategy, companies can effectively protect their software innovations. Erdem Kaya’s insights and the principles championed in the European context offer a practical and effective roadmap, demonstrating that with the right patenting strategy, software patents can indeed be a powerful instrument for success in the digital age.
Subject expert
Visit my expert profile on the digital IP lexicon:
👉 🔗𝗱𝗜𝗣𝗹𝗲𝘅
