Skip to main content
Reading Time: 5 mins

Ilanit Appelfeld is Subject Matter Expert in the CEIPI-EPO Master of IP Law and Management

Intellectual Property (IP) management is a cornerstone of competitive advantage in today’s innovation-driven economy. Yet, organizations face persistent challenges in structuring IP work, aligning it with business goals, and communicating its value to stakeholders. This blog post is a summary of the fourth module of the CEIPI-EPO Master Program in IP Law and Management (MIPLM) on the topic of C-level communication. An overview of this lecture is available here:

https://ipbusinessacademy.org/mastering-the-machinery-of-ip-in-module-4-ceipi-epo-miplm-organizational-theory-meets-ip-management

It explores these practical IP management complexities and highlights how Ilanit Appelfeld’s expertise in translating IP into business language offers a blueprint for overcoming these obstacles.

The Challenges of Organizing IP Work in the Industry

Organizing IP work requires balancing legal, technical, and strategic aspects while navigating market dynamics. Key challenges include:

Coordination Across Silos
IP management demands collaboration between R&D, IP, marketing, and executive teams. Misalignment between these groups often leads to inefficiencies, such as delayed patent filings or undervalued IP portfolios. For example, siloed departments struggle to share critical information, resulting in duplicated efforts and missed opportunities. Institutional Economics frames this through the lens of transaction costs—expenses tied to coordinating activities across dispersed teams. When departments operate in isolation, communication costs rise, eroding IP value.

Motivating Innovation Amid Risk Aversion
Innovators often prioritize technical breakthroughs over IP strategy, while executives focus on risk mitigation. This may be tackled by linking IP contributions to career advancement, aligning individual motivations with organizational objectives. Such rationality instruments—structures like performance metrics or contracts—are central to Institutional Economics, guiding behavior toward shared goals.

Adapting to Market Shifts
Globalization and evolving patent laws demand agile IP strategies. For instance, regional differences in patent enforcement complicate portfolio management. Transaction Cost Theory underscores the need for flexible organizational structures to reduce friction in adapting to these changes.

👉 https://ipbusinessacademy.org/investors-love-moats-how-to-show-your-ip-protects-your-business-model

Specific IP Management Challenges in Practice

Beyond organizational hurdles, IP managers grapple with challenges rooted in economic and strategic frameworks:

Securing Market Exclusivity
Patents and trademarks grant limited monopolies, but their value depends on enforcement and strategic alignment. Investors prioritize companies with IP portfolios that act as moats—barriers protecting market share and profitability. For example, patents covering core technologies deter competitors, while trademarks build brand loyalty, safeguarding consistent revenue. However, maintaining exclusivity requires proactive enforcement.

Leveraging Trade Secrets Strategically
Unlike patents, trade secrets offer perpetual protection if safeguarded. Proprietary processes or algorithms—such as Stripe’s fraud detection systems—can provide enduring competitive advantages. Yet, protecting trade secrets demands rigorous confidentiality measures and employee training, which many organizations underinvest in.

Aligning IP with Investor Expectations
Investors seek IP portfolios that signal innovation leadership and scalability. A robust IP strategy must demonstrate how patents, trademarks, and trade secrets align with R&D roadmaps and market expansion plans. For instance, Stripe’s combination of patents, trade secrets, and brand equity attracted billions in investment by showcasing defensible market positioning.

Overcoming Information Asymmetry
Executives and investors often lack the technical background to grasp IP’s strategic value. This gap leads to underinvestment in IP or misaligned priorities. Institutional Economics highlights bounded rationality—decision-making with incomplete information—as a root cause. Tools like IP analytics dashboards or simplified valuation models can bridge this gap, translating technical details into business-impact metrics.

Ilanit Appelfeld: Translating IP into Business Value

Ilanit Appelfeld’s approach exemplifies how to align IP strategy with executive and investor priorities. Focusing on the following aspects, her methodology turns IP into a narrative of growth and resilience:

  1. Framing IP as a Business Asset
    Appelfeld advocates framing IP in terms of revenue impact, risk mitigation, and scalability. For investors, this means highlighting how patents protect market exclusivity or how trademarks secure customer loyalty. Instead of listing patent claims, she maps them to product lifecycles or market entry barriers, demonstrating direct ties to revenue streams. This reduces information asymmetry and aligns IP discussions with investor priorities like ROI and market dominance.
  2. Demonstrating Enforcement and Adaptability
    Investors prioritize actionable IP strategies. Appelfeld emphasizes showcasing enforcement actions—such as litigation wins or licensing agreements—to prove a company’s commitment to protecting its assets.
  3. Leveraging Trade Secrets and Innovation Leadership
    Appelfeld highlights trade secrets as unsung heroes of IP strategy. By safeguarding proprietary methods (e.g., Stripe’s algorithms) and linking them to R&D pipelines, companies can project innovation leadership. She advises presenting trade secret policies—such as confidentiality agreements or access controls—to assure investors of long-term competitiveness.
  4. Aligning IP with Growth Narratives
    For startups and scale-ups, Appelfeld tailors IP communication for fundraising. At early stages, emphasizing patent filings and trademark registrations builds credibility. Later stages demand showcasing how IP enables partnerships or market expansion, as seen in Stripe’s collaborations with major platforms like Shopify. This approach transforms IP from a cost center into a growth driver.

Conclusion

IP management demands a focus on articulating IP value in business terms. Experts like Ilanit Appelfeld bridge the divide by translating IP assets into strategic narratives that resonate with executives and investors. By embedding IP into growth stories—whether through market exclusivity or innovation leadership—organizations can transform legal safeguards into engines of sustainable competitive advantage.

Subject expert

Visit my expert profile on the digital IP lexicon:

👉 🔗𝗱𝗜𝗣𝗹𝗲𝘅 

👉 LinkedIn 

Expert

Editorial Staff